• PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Biased as fuck lol. Installing windows is not difficult. I did it first time at the age of 8 witn WIndows 98 and their newer installers are made so the general public can do it. And the bloat and spyware? Thats windows dude. Its not meant to be your OS, its meant to spy on your ass at the benefit of being familiar and (relative) easy to use. Anything you do to it post clean install is your own tinkering. Linux distros are great yall, but install difficulty is not a metric I would use to attack windows. Comparing between distros makes sense.

    • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      I kind of miss the Win98 install process. I did it so many times… Tried making a Win98 virtual machine, but it just wasn’t the same without all the real floppies. The boot disk, the drivers. The JazzJ Jackrabbit shareware. Good times.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Linux installs like Ubuntu take about 20 minutes.

      The last time I installed windows 11 (thank God only once) it took me a total of 7 hours divided over 3 days. It was hell, requiring multiple iso downloads, multiple tries to burn a USB with a variety of tools, loads of searching and reading documentation, multiple BIOS settings and a BIOS update, multiple install attempts, searching, downloading and installing drivers, then finally on the winning install it still took like an hour with god knows how many “fuck off and do your job” clicks.

      Mind you, this was on the same machine where right before I installed Linux on a separate M2 device

      Windows installations are a horror show.

    • dolle@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It can be quite difficult for puzzling reasons. I bought my laptop with no OS because it was cheaper to buy a Windows license separately. I downloaded the ISO and put it on a USB drive and … It wouldn’t boot. It took me half a day and I had to follow guides with various black magic which I can’t even recall what was about to finally get the thing to boot from USB. After spending over a day on that, I installed Ubuntu and set up dual booting in about 30 minutes.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This doesn’t say it’s difficult, just says there are others which are less difficult. Even if you accept everything at default, windows installs take much longer.

      I’m not sure why you even think this is an attack on windows really. You keep saying windows is for those who want easy to use, so why not include the whole process?

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Longer != difficult. Windows installs are easy as fuck and id say its as simple as linux mint.
        The debloating is a choice and id say thats the same amount of work as installing stuff in linux because what it comes with is very limited.
        Im a linux mint user btw

        • nyctre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          It’s easier than even mint. Because I’ve installed windows dozens of times and it has always worked out of the box. Always.

          Friend gave me their old laptop that was sluggish and asked me to reinstall windows. I proposed Linux and promised them it’d work even better, they reluctantly agreed. I install mint. Sound not coming through headphones. I update everything that’s there to update, tried a bunch of shit and waste like an hour before I finally find a thread that suggested manually updating to a newer kernel version. That fixes it.

          Now I know something extra for next time but if it were someone less stubborn, they’d have given up and went back to windows. Most people don’t know and don’t care about debloating, trackers and whatnot.

          Tldr; Windows is the easiest OS to install because it works right out of the box. Many Linux distros are even easier to install, but don’t always work out of the box.

          • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            31 minutes ago

            Exactly. Linux mint was fine on my laptop, but only later i had to upgrade kernel for the amd drivers, but overall its the closest to a spotless experience ive had. But what you said is 1000% correct!

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Linux has made leaps and bounds with usability and ease of installation but it’s no better than any other modern OS - which is a good thing. Installing Windows from a USB stick is not difficult - the simple path is literally, pick a language, select your wifi, choose who is logging in, click install and go grab a coffee. About the only difficulty if you can call it one is that some installs will ask for a serial number because it’s a commercial product.

        Also, the number of questions & buttons during installation is one thing but the certainty of a functioning system is another. Linux is better at supporting old hardware, Windows is better at supporting new hardware. Choose accordingly if that matters.