• ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I tried to explain the Fediverse to the marketing department at my company and the looks of confusion just made me gave up.

      • troed@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 month ago

        “It’s like email. We have our company domain and others have theirs and it all just works”

        • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s a great start to an explanation, but first, you are assuming that people know how email works, and second, unlike email, federated social media has discovery, feeds, and in general content that gets pushed to you. How all of that works can be complicated and if you join a small instance, you may not realize how much content you are missing because of it.

          • OtterA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            In some cases, I think technical explanations aren’t necessary. For some people, the recommendation could be more like

            Here are some growing platforms that people are using. I feel that this one is the most viable long term, and so we should maintain a presence there in addition to whatever else we choose.

            The marketing department doesn’t need to know how email works in order to set up newsletters

    • OtterA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The analogy the other day works well, aside from the LaTeX one which still feels like a stretch

      • Firefox : Chrome
      • Linux : Windows
      • LaTex : MS Word
      • actual Fediverse : Bluesky’s Fediverseᵀᴹ

      However I’m happy to be here. Mastodon is getting a boost right now too. Even if they didn’t, and everyone on Twitter moved to bluesky, I don’t expect those instances to close up shop

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        https://atproto.com/guides/applications

        You can use atproto to build other federated applications.

        Just because one implementation of atproto (bluesky) doesn’t have feature parity, doesn’t mean it’s a fake federated protocol.

        ‘actual fediverse’ and ‘bluesky fediverse’ doesn’t make sense as a comparison.

        It’s more like, ActivityPub vs ATProto.

        https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto

        Bluesky is just one implementation of the protocol, that implementation happens to have a lot of steam, but it’s not fake or anything.

        • OtterA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I wouldn’t call it fake, but the concern is about who created, maintains, and/or controls the protocol

          ActivityPub was developed by W3C, and it’s properly decentralized. For Atproto, the concern is that Bluesky will exert control over the protocol once shareholders and profit get in the way of making a good product.

          Last I heard they were discussing potentially moving the necessary registry/directory to a separate non-profit “like ICANN”, but even with that they seemed noncommittal about it.

          I’d love to see more diversity in the federated space. Competition and iterative development is how we make things better. But I need Bluesky to take those necessary steps before I feel comfortable endorsing it over ActivityPub

    • troed@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      ATproto is way more over-engineered than ActivityPub, and due to its crypto currency roots using merkle trees it simply cannot scale decentralized.