• Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    You can’t prove an outcome 100x worse because the future hasn’t happened yet.

    Yes, that is indeed how the future works, but I’m confident trump is much worse than Kamala on this issue, based on past events, which tends to be the best predictor of future events.

    Speaking of which…

    With Biden’s behavior towards Russia post election, there’s no guarantee that Harris bringing us into WW3 wouldn’t be 100x worse.

    The term you should lookup is “appeasement”, you should have paid more attention during middle school history, and less attention to whatever conspiracy/propaganda hole that fuckwit opinion dribbled out of.

    • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Cool, why don’t you go look up mutually assured destruction?

      Sorry but trying to get Ukraine into nato was nato poking the Russians. The maiden revolution was a color regime change by the west to throw out a pro Russian leader back in 2014 by Obama’s ambassador Victoria neuland.

      This could of all been avoided, but then how would the military industrial complex goons afford the remodel on their third bathroom in their fourth house?

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Cool, why don’t you go look up mutually assured destruction?

        Uncle Vlad isn’t going to nuke everything he’s got simply because he’s not allowed to have a little bit more of something that is not his in the first place.

        As for Ukraine wanting to join NATO, that only happens after Russia invaded in 2022. There was a vote in 2014, but it had low support in the populace at the time.

        You should really examine where you are getting your info from, your view of history and current events is not congruent with reality…

        • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Delusional. The second a single nuke no matter how small is dropped is the second they all start flying. He’s desperate to stay in power and the US is desperate to regime change him.

          I expect Harris, if elected, would of given us higher WW3 chances.

          We shouldn’t be going through nuclear brinkmanship right now, and there’s been plenty of off ramps to put an end to this but the military industrial complex needs forever wars to function. It’s not a coincidence we find ourselves once again in a forever war just after the last one “ended”.

          And what happened in 2014? Oh yeah. Some nato fucking around and regime changing in Ukraine. This could of been avoided.

            • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I don’t support him. But the US and Ukraine have had numerous off ramps and instead want a forever war.

              • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                I don’t recall claiming that you did, but thanks for telling everyone out of the blue about it.

                As for Ukraine’s offramps… Giving Vlad back his nukes and wanting their established border with Russia respected was to much to ask for his little ego?