Mex@feddit.ukM to UK Active Travel@feddit.ukEnglish · 1 month agoTelegraph slammed for manipulating photos of “law-abiding people exercising” for column claiming “speeding cyclists” endanger drivers… despite riders averaging 14.6mphroad.ccexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up128arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up126arrow-down1external-linkTelegraph slammed for manipulating photos of “law-abiding people exercising” for column claiming “speeding cyclists” endanger drivers… despite riders averaging 14.6mphroad.ccMex@feddit.ukM to UK Active Travel@feddit.ukEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square10fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 month ago Weird, here is says drivers. The headline for the article posted says drivers. It has a screenshot of the article it’s complaining about, and says right there in black and white the danger is from cyclists to pedestrians. I thought since this wasn’t a community specifically for cyclists that people would be able to see what is happening… But apparently you all will just keep finding this days later and letting me know you only read the headline and comments
minus-squareOrlandoDoom@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoIt’s an article about some drivel from the telegraph, why would I read that?
The headline for the article posted says drivers.
It has a screenshot of the article it’s complaining about, and says right there in black and white the danger is from cyclists to pedestrians.
I thought since this wasn’t a community specifically for cyclists that people would be able to see what is happening…
But apparently you all will just keep finding this days later and letting me know you only read the headline and comments
It’s an article about some drivel from the telegraph, why would I read that?