• AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Blocking a cycle path impacts the safety of cyclists if they’re too stupid and impatient to wait a few seconds.

    Why would you quote a point and then not just fail to refute it, but reply with something that point refutes? Are you stupid?

    You’re projecting.

    Belligerent stupid child. You’ve had it spelled out for you but you can’t hear anything that doesn’t flatter your selfishness. You’re whining about an inconvenience of a few seconds and you feel entitled to my physical well being. The risk you claim only exists if you’re a fucking moron that swerves into traffic instead of a) looking, or b) waiting. The risk to my body is not a risk; it’s a consequence of the extra stress on my body that costs you nothing and is therefore of no consequence.

    The good news, you piece of shit sociopath? You don’t get a fucking say. I’m going to take care to keep myself safe and healthy no matter how much of a spoiled tantrum you throw about it.

    Seethe, you fucking lowlife.

    • rah@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Blocking a cycle path impacts the safety of cyclists if they’re too stupid and impatient to wait a few seconds.

      Not blocking a cycle path impacts the safety of Amazon drivers if they’re too stupid and impatient to walk a few seconds.

      you piece of shit sociopath

      U seem angry bro.