Yeah, both sides amiright?

  • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They’re still sending weapons. You can’t keep giving guns to a guy that keeps murdering people, and then say “I told him not to murder people it’s not my fault”. How would that hold up in court?

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      As long as Israel is under threat from Iran and other forces, we will continue sending them weapons and support. That’s the entire stated reason for supporting them.

      • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And Israel keeps mass-murdering civilians with said weapons and the US govt knows it.

          • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            59 minutes ago

            That excuse wouldn’t fly in a courtroom if someone helped a murderer (repeatedly and knowingly), even if they claim they gave them the weapon for self-defense. It’s proven the US govt knows what the weapons are used for, and they’ve been sending them continuously for over a year. It’s called being an accessory to the crime.

            Btw the genocide convention explicitly lists under article III e “complicity in genocide.”