• Kerrigor@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hahahaha

    Sticking one’s head in the sand and pretending security is a non-issue is not actually more secure

    • WiildFiire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you can’t admit security is better through IOS then you’re the one sticking your head in the sand, tbh

      • Kerrigor@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Security on Android, as an OS, is arguably better. However in practice it’s very manufacturer-dependent. If they didn’t butcher the OS, and actually rolled updates without carriers getting in the way, it wouldn’t be a contest at all.

        • Quentinp
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          " If they didn’t butcher the OS, and actually rolled updates without carriers getting in the way, it wouldn’t be a contest at all." but they did though.

    • Quentinp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Huh?

      Unfortunately for Android users, Google researchers discovered known vulnerabilities, or n-days, that essentially equated to zero-days for Android due to a lack of timely patching issues. The vendor observed that attackers didn’t need zero-day exploits to attack the Android ecosystem because in many cases, patches weren’t available for known flaws, which were then exploited on unpatched devices.