Just a moment...
apnews.com

Summary

A federal judge in Illinois ruled the state’s ban on semiautomatic weapons unconstitutional, citing recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions that reinforce Second Amendment rights.

Judge Stephen McGlynn issued a permanent injunction against the Protect Illinois Communities Act, which bans AR-15-style rifles and high-capacity magazines, but delayed its enforcement for 30 days to allow for appeal.

The law, enacted after a 2022 mass shooting in Highland Park, faced opposition from gun rights advocates and some local sheriffs.

Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul promptly appealed the ruling, with Gov. J.B. Pritzker expressing confidence the ban will ultimately be upheld.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.worldEnglish
      239·
      1 month ago

      Banning arms in common use is unconstitutional. Like it or not, these arms are in common use.

        • BombOmOm@lemmy.worldEnglish
          143·
          1 month ago

          It’s not a ban on ownership

          According to the AP, it is most certainly a ban on ownership. “Illinois banned the sale or possession of semiautomatic weapons”. This is the core reason the law was overturned, it’s unconstitutional to ban arms in common use.

          • h3adphones@lemmy.zipEnglish
            102·
            1 month ago

            It also says this in the article you linked:

            Those who already own such guns will have to register them, including serial numbers, with the Illinois State Police.

            So it would apply to new purchases, but not those already owned. I’m disappointed in AP’s reporting on this, different parts of the article seem to contradict one another on what the law actuality does.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        75·
        1 month ago

        If they are banned, then they won’t be in common use, so it would be constitutional.

        If you think my logic is flawed then you understand exactly why the supreme Court’s ruling is flawed.