OTTAWA – A smug man from Canada wasted no time this morning chastising Americans for re-electing terrifying liar and felon Donald Trump, despite the fact that he plans to vote for terrifying liar and asshole Pierre Poilievre in the next Canadian election.

Matt Hunter, a 36-year-old barista, took time away from attending a Poilievre rally to rant about how stupid Americans were for falling for Trump’s fascist bullshit.

“I just can’t believe that someone could look at a petty asshole running on slogans, lies, and faux outrage and think, ‘Yeah, this guy will be good for the country,’” Hunter laughed, taking a quick second to repost an “Axe the Tax, Build the Homes, Fix the Budget, Stop the Crime” tweet on X. “It makes no sense. Luckily we up here in Canada have more common sense. Pierre says so.”

“When Poilievre becomes Prime Minister next year, he’s gonna stand up to Trump. They’re so different in ways that I can’t even describe. Don’t even ask me what those ways are. Just trust me, bro. He’ll bring Canada home again.”

  • Victor Villas
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Interesting. Which claim would you be interested in reading the sources?

    • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Anyone you think is an expert and has made claims about electronic voting being a good idea 😂. I cant refute your nonsense without knowing what you are seeing and thinking. We’d just continuely talk past each other.

      • Victor Villas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        “good idea” is subjective and unspecific language so it doesn’t make sense to find sources for it. Can you just quote specific sentence I said that you would like to refute as “nonsense”?

        • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Na we’re done. There isnt anything to discuss at this point. Ive asserted the entire idea is bunk and you’ve asserted without evidence that ‘expert researchers’ say it isnt but dont have any sources.