• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is just pattenly untrue.Unless you litterally live I. a corporate news echo chamber, the writing for this has been on the wall, and being discussed as such, litterally everywhere.

    However, it was also being downvoted at a preposterously high ratio. So while it was present, Lemmy (and reddit too and pretty much all social media) was dutifully ignoring and abusing those saying that Kamala wasn’t winning.

    Not only that, but there were bans, and significant bias in moderation behavior to support the building of that echo chamber.

    So no. Only if you live in a self construct d bubble was this not obvious since the convention.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, its funny comparing online to real world discussions.

      Most people I talked to seemed to never like Harris but all agreed Trump was worse. This tracks, makes sense, and the ones that did not think Trump was worse would vote for him.

      Compare that to here where you had every negative thing said about Harris come with some heavy baggage (like .ml accounts) or out right dog piling.

    • SplashJackson
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wait a minute, is it “patently” untrue, so false that you couldn’t even get a copyright on it, or is it “Pattonly” untrue, a feignt tactic like those used by US general Patton in the Great War 2 against Irwin Rommel in Africa?