• masterspace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Lmao, bruh here thinks his brain evolved to process scales of millions and comprehend a nanometer.

    Are you a special unique bro different from everyone else?

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s 14,000 to 75,000, not millions.

      Microplastics are in the range of one micrometer to five millimeters, not nanometers.

      • masterspace
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That changes literally nothing of what I said. Your brain did not evolve to process those scales accurately. If you think you can, that just means you’re lacking in self reflection.

        • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Being factually incorrect about literally everything you said changes nothing? Okay.

          More importantly, humans are capable of abstract thought. Your whole argument is specious. If you find yourself lacking the context to understand these numbers, you can easily seek context. A good starting place would be the actual paper, which is linked in OP’s article. For the lazy: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-61146-4

          • masterspace
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Being factually incorrect about literally everything you said changes nothing? Okay.

            Yeah bruh, it’s this little thing called being pedantic.

            If I say wealth inequality is crazy, no one should have 250 billion dollars, and you say ‘well actually Jeff Bezos only has 210 billion dollars’, then I will be factually incorrect and my point will still be completely valid.