• dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 days ago

    So if they lose, it was election fraud. If they win, then it must be in spite of that same fraud then, right?

    Either way, I’m not expecting to see evidence of the fraud. Sad.

    • jdnewmil
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      Evidence? You don’t believe that Joe’s friend’s cousin saw someone dumping ballots into a Yugo? /s

    • orbitz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      That’s what it was in 2016 too, there was a thing with Trump saying CA had millions of illegal votes for Hillary and set up a team to prove it. Oddly those findings weren’t really talked about, easy to drown out with the noise he caused every single day of his term. Like there was something with Ivankas trademarksc(patents?) in China and the Moscow tower, I can’t even remember which one he used to down our which anymore.

      There’s a decent chance I forgot which scandels it was in reference to but there was even an article about how he tweeted something to change the news focus.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      I expect to see evidence of the fraud. Lots of republicans will wind up arrested for it just like the previous two elections