• yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’m having trouble being outraged by a robber-Barron trying to influence American politics by controlling a media outlet, because to do so would imply that that is outside the norm or unusual in some way.

    This isn’t even recent. We once occupied the Philippines and continue to occupy Guantanamo Bay behind the yellow journalism of rich cunt newspapermen Herst and Pulitzer who were in a competition to out lie each other, that was 1898.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    An independent newspaper might someday choose to back away from making presidential endorsements. But this isn’t the right moment, when one candidate is advocating positions that directly threaten freedom of the press and the values of the Constitution.

    Beautifully put.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Makes me hope even more that Harris will tax these fuckers into oblivion. Nobody should be a billionaire period. And wealthy individuals shouldn’t have enough power to be able to impact elections.

  • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    So the endorsement ban publicized their stance even more widely. I don’t even know whom any other newspaper endorsed.

    • ahornsirup@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You can’t blame people for needing a job. They probably don’t exactly have a choice other than to keep working.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s got to start somewhere, and it usually starts small. Let’s focus on building up the momentum, so that little snowball turns into an avalanche.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      If a couple percent of the population stops shopping there, Amazon will miss it’s quarterly numbers and the stock price will fall sharply.

  • count_dongulus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not like Bezos is there running anything day to day. Management could ignore him, say OK sure thing boss, and print it anyway. What’s he gonna do? Fire them? 🤷

  • humanspiral
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Did WaPo change their byline to this, or is this OP satire?

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t think avoiding Amazon or boycotts can have an effect on someone with that ridiculous concentration of wealth, but I admire the effort and expression of distaste.