mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 1 month agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1202arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1200arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square56fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoHonestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
minus-squareTraister101@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoNah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoSure, not saying C++ isn’t cluttered.
Honestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
Nah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
Sure, not saying C++ isn’t cluttered.