• SpaceCowboy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Have you tried disagreeing on a call! It’s hard!”

    When it’s an online meeting, they’re worried about it potentially being recorded. So what they’re really saying is that they can’t verbally abuse employees without there potentially being evidence of it.

      • SpaceCowboy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The CEO of Zoom explictily stated that he felt in zoom meetings people were being too “friendly” and not willing to have “debate”.

        Why would it be bad for employees to be friendly? What employees want to have unfriendly debates in meetings? I think it’s just managers that want that. What kind of “debate” do managers want? Why do they not want meetings to be “friendly”? Methinks they just want to yell at employees and don’t feel comfortable doing it in zoom meetings for some reason…

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          But the leap you’re making is between a single statement from one CEO and the nebulous “they”.

          I’ve been pretty close to billionaire CEOs in my career and certainly the ones I’ve come across have been well equipped to handle the job, well adjusted and well meaning.

          • SpaceCowboy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Now you’re talking about CEOs as a nebulous they.

            I’m talking about a CEO that said things similar to what an amazon exec said under an article about what that amazon exec said.

            Also I work in software development. There has been a clear uptick in negativity towards developers where I work, which happens to be in a similar field to the one in the article.

            I’ve also worked with AWS, and I can tell you for sure, they can’t afford to lose their best talent. Their system is pretty janky in many places and their boss should be putting more effort in making better software instead of playing games about forcing people to sit in a specific chair 5 days per week.

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I said “the ones I’ve come across”. Thats as “leap free” as I can make that statement.

              I agree re AWS; they’ve already got super disgruntled staff and they definitely cannot afford to lose good staff from this.