Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoHow to clean a rescued pigeonsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.26Karrow-down1imageHow to clean a rescued pigeonsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square139fedilink
minus-squareMystikIncarnatelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 month agoTechnically, it’s not wrong. It’s also not helpful, but it’s not wrong.
minus-squareJumi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoBut isn’t it wrong? I don’t think something coming next can be already in the past or am I wrong?
minus-squarescholar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoIt says it will happen after the 17th
minus-squarehowrarlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·29 days agoIt is wrong because the highlighted portion of the excerpt is supposed to directly answer the question. This one doesn’t.
minus-squareMystikIncarnatelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·28 days agoYou’re arguing that the highlighting is wrong, that it should include “after” in the highlight?
minus-squareMystikIncarnatelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·28 days agoSeems minor, but alright. You’re entitled to an opinion on it, same as everyone else.
Technically, it’s not wrong.
It’s also not helpful, but it’s not wrong.
But isn’t it wrong? I don’t think something coming next can be already in the past or am I wrong?
It says it will happen after the 17th
Oh, you’re right. I didn’t see that
It is wrong because the highlighted portion of the excerpt is supposed to directly answer the question. This one doesn’t.
You’re arguing that the highlighting is wrong, that it should include “after” in the highlight?
Exactly
Seems minor, but alright. You’re entitled to an opinion on it, same as everyone else.