Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoHow to clean a rescued pigeonsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.26Karrow-down1imageHow to clean a rescued pigeonsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square139fedilink
minus-squareMystikIncarnatelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 months agoTechnically, it’s not wrong. It’s also not helpful, but it’s not wrong.
minus-squareJumi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoBut isn’t it wrong? I don’t think something coming next can be already in the past or am I wrong?
minus-squarescholar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoIt says it will happen after the 17th
minus-squarehowrarlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoIt is wrong because the highlighted portion of the excerpt is supposed to directly answer the question. This one doesn’t.
minus-squareMystikIncarnatelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoYou’re arguing that the highlighting is wrong, that it should include “after” in the highlight?
minus-squareMystikIncarnatelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoSeems minor, but alright. You’re entitled to an opinion on it, same as everyone else.
Technically, it’s not wrong.
It’s also not helpful, but it’s not wrong.
But isn’t it wrong? I don’t think something coming next can be already in the past or am I wrong?
It says it will happen after the 17th
Oh, you’re right. I didn’t see that
It is wrong because the highlighted portion of the excerpt is supposed to directly answer the question. This one doesn’t.
You’re arguing that the highlighting is wrong, that it should include “after” in the highlight?
Exactly
Seems minor, but alright. You’re entitled to an opinion on it, same as everyone else.