• tuckerm@supermeter.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    They keep using the term “motion sensor,” probably to avoid saying “this device that you will place next to your kid’s bed has a camera and an internet connection.”

    (related community if that makes you nearly have an aneurysm: [email protected])

    edit: OK, it probably doesn’t actually have a camera, see comment below. I assumed it had to, since it mentioned detecting “hand gestures.” However, that could mean that it just roughly detects you waving in front of it, which wouldn’t require a camera. I still hate it.

    • key@lemmy.keychat.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      The features described could be accomplished with a PIR motion sensor. I don’t see any reason they’d go to the expense of adding a camera, especially since infrared is better for operating in the dark like you’d expect for an alarm clock that’ll need to be able to wake kids at 6am in the winter.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are very efficient and accurate ways to detect motion without an internet connection…

      That said, the configuration probably means it has an internet connection anyways.