• candyman337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    All our systems put in place had failed us, if this isn’t paid for by insurance then wtf is the point? Also where will it come from?? Pay for it! Are you kidding, this country is ready to increase the deficit for everything else, they can pay for this

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Insurance only covers wind damage, not flood damage, unless you specifically carry Flood Insurance. Which is prohibitively high in frequently flooded areas, and expensive enough in usually-not-floodprone areas that nobody buys it there either.

      You know “no take, only throw”? With insurance companies it’s “no payouts, only premiums.”

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      A lot of these people don’t have homeowners’ or flood insurance. Of course insurance isn’t going to pay for it.

      • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Do you not see that it’s ridiculous that you need multiple types of insurance? It’s a scam. Every step of the way they’re trying to deny your claim. Just because that’s how the system works doesn’t mean that’s how it should be.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I agree and I don’t see why you’re going after me about how the system works. It’s not going to magically work how we both want it to just because how it’s set up now is unfair.