• Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “Allah is above them”

    Maybe, but the flying spaghetti monster is even higher!

  • TacticsConsort@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Gonna say it, this REALLY feels like a case of the news cherry-picking what parts of a protest they show. Between the unreasonable viewpoint that’s directly adjacent to a very sensible and popular viewpoint and the fact we KNOW the media have a very vested interest in trying to push pro-genocide narratives (such as anti-Israel protests being pro-terrorist)…

    Yeah, even someone as gullible as me? I’m not buying this.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This is the telegraph.

      Imagine Boris Johnson dressed in tweed and living in a cottage in Devon

      That’s their reader base

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      UK news sources are very prone to behaving like that, if you ever spent time in r/GreenAndPleasant it’s shocking how much UK news you dont hear about. Anything vaguely anti-crown just doesn’t get coverage. Or protests in general.

      It’s part of why they media bias bot is laughable given it considers BBC unbiased

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 minutes ago

        It’s part of why they media bias bot is laughable given it considers BBC unbiased

        Do you remember the “Sir you are being hunted” indie game? That is what i imagine the bot to look like, wearing tweed and living in his evil robot cottage.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Among the placards on display on the London march was one showing a silhouette of Nasrallah, with the words “We will not abandon Palestine”.

    One example. One.

    Others declared: “Hezbollah are not terrorists” and “I love Hezbollah”.

    How many? How many out of the entire crowd?

    The placards were on prominent display, despite the Metropolitan Police warning on Friday that it would crack down on any displays of support for prescribed terror groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah.

    What does “prominent display” mean in the context of a public protest?

    They had two photos of such signs, clearly from the same group of people. Which must be a pretty small group considering that is the entirety of their evidence.

    Frankly, I’m weighing deleting this article as misinformation.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Weird how I’m not seeing all the pro-terrorist signs in the photo of the crowd at the top of that image.

      I wonder if maybe the Telegraph, run by one of the conservative, ultra-rich Barclay brothers, might have some sort of agenda here?

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        IMO organizing or attending these marches so close to the anniversary of the massacre is itself pretty clearly pro-terror, in the way that people prominently associating themselves with the date of April 20 are also supporting a similar ideology without having to name it explicitly.

        It’s not like there are marches every weekend. They specifically chose this weekend.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          5 hours ago

          pretty clearly pro-terror

          That is utter nonsense. Regardless of what Hamas did on October 7th, which I am guessing pretty much no one there thinks was a good thing, it was also the day Israel’s genocide started. Large numbers of innocent Palestinians, including a huge number of children, started being killed that day.

          And you know for a fact that it doesn’t matter when the protest happens in terms of this sort of negative coverage. Or did you think the media took a positive view of the campus protests a few months ago when it was definitely not October anything?

          • Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            No, no. There needs to be a clear 6.5 month buffer on both sides of the attack before any protest can happen. /s

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              It’s like the “too soon to talk about guns” after every school shooting, but there are regular school shootings, so it’s always too soon.

    • BMTea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      “Holocaust-inversion” is one of those phrases that just immediately marks you as a hasbarist.

  • Troy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Really? You love militants who would probably rather kill you than have a coffee with you?

      • Troy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I suspect a lot of people are unhappy and are looking for solutions. They aren’t evaluating their solutions, just latching onto the first things that make them feel like change is possible.

        • Draghetta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          This is the best explanation of anything I’ve read in years. I think you are spot on. There would be a lot less polarisation online if people understood this.

        • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I think people are looking outside their persona atomization and realizing the world is much worse than the hegemonic narrative would have us believe. As more information becomes available, old ideology declines. The smug comfort of white bros is disturbed when their moral authority is questioned. If they can’t make lazy jokes about having coffee in a genocide, is anything safe anymore?

    • BMTea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What the hell are you even talking about? Where do you people get the idea that Hezbollah and every other Islamist entity is like ISIS? Do you know a single thing about Lebanon???

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I mean, they are picking militants who are opposing genocide. Choosing ‘would rather kill you’ over ‘are killing you’ is logical in a limited context.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Oh, trust me, those militants are very much pro-genocide, they just haven’t quite figured out a way to be successful at it.

        • BMTea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Oh, trust me

          No thanks, guy who thinks the average person in Hezbollah wants to inexplicably kill a random British person rather than have coffee with them.