• gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    So basically the bill would hold companies accountable for safety testing their potentially dangerous products. He vetoed it because it would be “too onerous.”

    I’m sorry but if it is to onerous for a business to safety test a product, then they should not be making that product.

  • BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m just seeing all these vetoes. Is he not communicating well with the legislators? Did they pass all of these knowing he would veto ? Is this about sending a message?

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    In his statement, Newsom said the bill focused too much on the biggest and most powerful AI models, saying smaller upstarts could prove to be just as disruptive.

    Jesus Christ… “don’t pass a law stopping Facebook from sucking up your data because some other company could take over for Facebook and suck up your data instead.”