The first direct high-speed train service between both cities will be running from December, according to Deutsche Bahn. It will offer a journey without transfers, with stops in Frankfurt, Strasbourg and Karlsruhe.

  • azimir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s also the very muddled announcement that to make it you’ll need to change trains at some small town.

    Or, they just decide to not stop at your station, so you get to hop off past your station and ride a train back the way you came.

    All that said, it’s still a miracle from God compared to the crap we have in the US.

    • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tell me about it. I was checking to see if was faster to go by train to the inland empire from Orange county. It takes the train longer than it would take me to go in car and be in traffic the whole way. I shit you not on this. I was like how? What fuckin traffic does a train have to be 2 behind a car in traffic?

      • azimir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        The Amtrak system in the US shares rail, and is low priority, than freight trains. Basically, passenger rail has always been a side business for the train companies the US. It is subsidized and used as a bribe by the federal government to even try to keep a passenger rail service alive.

        That means our trains are often kept as slow speeds to stay behind freight trains, and will be stopped to wait for freight trains if some is off schedule. The routes are also mostly only rated for 60mph speeds, so even at full speed you’re barely keeping up with cars on the highway, and then you add in stops at every podunk town that slows it down even more.

        Until the US invests in a separate passenger rail network that can support consistent speed and schedules, it will remain on par with similarly under developed nations for rail service.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          By law, railroads must give passenger trains priority.

          In practice, that doesn’t really happen. If a big heavy freight train is taking up a single track, or is too long to wait on a siding, it’s going to go first. And if it’s stopped, it’s going to take a while for it to get up to speed.

        • TotallyNotADolphin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          From what I understand, freight trains in the US are also paid in terms of tonnage per train. This incentivises slapping on as many carts with product as possible, even as speed suffers under the strain of all that weight. Considering that all single tracks require meeting trains to stop and wait for these super long, super slow freight trains, passenger traffic get a lot of increased travel time.

          There is a more in depth and interesting video on the issue here(Wendover Productions) https://youtu.be/qQTjLWIHN74?si=h8wri7SeNeMwImVz

        • corsicanguppy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          similarly under[-]developed nations for rail service.

          Canada would like to say Soory, partially because we’ve legislated it as meaningless and also because it’s the least-expensive response to this allegation.