• Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      We don’t need to start from Hobbes

      Recommends Hobbes as a starting point

      I agree 100% but just had a bit of a giggle

      • mholiv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 hours ago

        lol. I realized that as I was writing that. But I went with it. Hobbes is a great starting point for people new to political philosophy.

        We just don’t need to start with him.

        I think John Rawls is a better starting place if we were to start a society from scratch. Just a bit harder for people less used to reading philosophical works.

    • Yeller_king@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Sure, but if simply keeping the roads safe was their only objective, they wouldn’t have things like quotas where they have to shake down a certain number of people for the sake of their budget.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        That depends a lot on the quota system. If they’re easily achievable then it’s not going to incentivize bad stops. If you have a county that gets four cars a day and the quota is four cars then there’s a problem. Generally it’s a useful way to make sure your police aren’t sitting at the donut shop while they should be working. Like most policies its problems lie in the extremes.