• 1 Post
  • 644 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 28th, 2023

help-circle




  • I read the articles and strongly disagree. ADHD is real and meaningful. It’s not a reaction to “illegitimate authority” or “working a boring job”.

    Your sources are pushing ADHD denialism and read as ableist right wing nonsense. ODD too.

    Many people with severe anxiety and/or depression are also anti-authoritarians. Often a major pain of their lives that fuels their anxiety and/or depression is fear that their contempt for illegitimate authorities will cause them to be financially and socially marginalized; but they fear that compliance with such illegitimate authorities will cause them existential death.

    Going stupid — or passive aggression — is one of many nondisease explanations for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Studies show that virtually all ADHD-diagnosed children will pay attention to activities that they enjoy or that they have chosen. In other words, when ADHD-labeled kids are having a good time and in control, the “disease” goes away.

    This is an insult to people who suffer from real conditions and an insult to those who suffered under Soviet style weaponization of mental health.


  • Companies are allowed to participate in the community. They are wallowed to use community code. Companies donating servers and resources is actually a good thing. This includes Valve. The “greediness” you talk about isn’t a factor.

    Also factually none of those projects you listed were started by IBM. Half of them were started by GNU foundation. The other half were started by Redhat before it was acquired by IBM.

    The way Redhat made money was by taking community code and packaging it with support guarantees for other companies. Redhat took that money and hired people to further improve that community code they were packaging. I was at Redhat at the time.

    Regarding freeBSD you are forgetting the literal largest user of BSD in the world. Netflix voluntarily gives back code to the community but they aren’t forced to.

    Sony is the largest user of FreeBSD in the world. They take the code. Use it improve it and give nothing back. From the PS3 forward all of their devices are based on FreeBSD.

    Microsoft also is a large user of FreeBSD in a way. When they couldn’t add a proper networking stack to Windows without everything crashing all the time they’re turned to FreeBSD. Microsoft ripped out the networking code and glued it into Windows 2000. From there we got XP, Vista, 7, 8, 10, and now 11. All with community code taken and used to fight community coded operating systems.

    I guess it all comes down to how you see companies. If you believe that companies will always act in the interest of the community even at the expense of competitiveness I can see how one might see MIT or BSD licenses as adequate.

    GPL, LGPL, and MPL on the other hand force companies to give back when they take.

    I don’t trust companies enough to use MIT. I choose GPL, LGPL, and MPL.

    If a company intended to give back to the community there is no reason why they would not use GPL, LGPL, or MPL. They intend to tie back anyways. Right? MIT just lets them keep their taking but not giving options open.













  • Maybe to people inside .ml it isn’t informative, but to people outside of .ml it really is.

    For people outside of .ml it’s like hearing “just look the manager in the eye and give them a handshake. Then you’ll get the job!” This advice just comes off as weird and disconnected till you realize the person is a boomer. Then it clicks and you realize why they have such a bad take.

    Like .ml not all boomers have weird takes but if you see a weirdly disconnected take on job hunting knowing the poster is a boomer is informative.

    Same with weird pro Russia or pro china takes with .ml.

    When people outside of .ml see takes like “Putin is waging a just, defensive, war against Ukraine!” The take is so bad as to be disconnected from reality, then you realize the poster is .ml and it snaps into place. Just like the boomer situation.

    Again not all .ml have such bad takes, just like not all boomers have bad takes but when you see such a bad take knowing helps clarify things. It’s informative.

    I hope this helps you understand even if you don’t agree.