The sound of many of them exploding


  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s a good point

    But the accusation isn’t flippant. That’s exactly what this is.

    • MrSpArkle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      If the beepers and radios were targeted at Hezbollah militia members, then it isn’t terrorism.

      If the equipment was sold in regular retail channels meant for the general Lebanese population, then it is terrorism.

      We don’t know enough to make that call 100%, but early analysis is strongly suggesting it was targeted.

      To call it terrorism at this point is flippant and unsupported, and draws attention away from and fails to highlight their larger crime of genocide.

      • TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        It is absolutely terrorism. When the pagers went off most of the people hit by them were in plain clothes, including a child, people were just seeing other randomly exploding and are adding strain to hospitals. This is a terrorist attack.

        • MrSpArkle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, and when we bombed Germany in WW2 we killed hundreds of children. War is bad. Terrorism is bad. But they are different things.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Genocide =/= war. Stop trying to justify genocidal terrorism on the basis of some imaginary “war”.

            • MrSpArkle
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              There is a difference between the actions in Gaza and the actions in Lebanon.

        • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It is absolutely terrorism

          Too early to tell, but likely not

          most of the people hit by them were in plain clothes

          oh good, if i find myself an active combatant in a war-zone i should just chuck on a t-shirt.

          including a child

          Regrettable but civilian casualties in a war-zone are inevitable

          people were just seeing other (presumably you meant to put “people” here) randomly exploding

          they weren’t randoms, at the moment it seems they were Hezbollah

          and are adding strain to hospitals

          That’ll happen when a large number of combatants are taken out at once

          • cafeinux@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think the point was that, for the people around, this was undistinguishable from suicide bombers, which are usually considered as terrorists. Terrorism is meant to inspire terror and insecurity. This did exactly that.

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            Human Rights Watch called it unlawful:

            Customary international humanitarian lawprohibits the use of booby traps – objects that civilians are likely to be attracted to or are associated with normal civilian daily use – precisely to avoid putting civilians at grave risk and produce the devastating scenes that continue to unfold across Lebanon today. The use of an explosive device whose exact location could not be reliably known would be unlawfully indiscriminate, using a means of attack that could not be directed at a specific military target and as a result would strike military targets and civilians without distinction.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            There is no “war-zone”. There are no “combatants”.

            There’s just genocidal terrorists murdering civilians in several different states.