- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
saw this kicking around on the lobsters frontpage
IBM also includes a DPU for accelerating IO, along with an on-board AI accelerator
ah yes. an AI accelerator. for a chip that goes into a system that’ll quite possibly have a lifespan measured in decade-partials. in environments so extremely up to date with the bleeding edge of technology that they are absolutely not losing their programmers to retirement. an AI acceleator for that. makes total sense.
imagine being the poor engineers who had to spec that out, design it, and get it actually existing. nevermind even the awe-inspiringly stunning disregard to reality that it takes for some management fuckhead(s) to have “steered” this
Funny enough, I asked why IBM had different terminology compared to the rest of the industry. They said IBM came up with the terminology first, and later on the industry adopted different terminology. It was all lighthearted and funny.
ah yes! funny! haha. not at all some weird insular shit from the same company that runs a worlds-apart platform with a control grip so strong it makes larry ellison check if they’re infringing on anything actionable…
that ai accelerator will be used to spit out believably-looking but fucked up in subtle ways cobol. that’s job security with a side of eldritch horrors
haha I did try to ponder what the “LLMs, but cobol” corp world would look like but I couldn’t really think of anything particularly good, although this might be one
the other I thought of is:
I’m sure it’ll all go perfectly well