• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I disagree that you can give consent without knowledge.

    You can be obligated by your existence, or your culture, or your circumstances, but it does not mean you consented.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        That is a tautology, and also cyclic and thus doesn’t address the point that you can not unconsciously give consent.

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          3 months ago

          The end effect of obligations, culture, and circumstances are all just consent - even without your direct permission. If the end result is not different, what is the difference then?

          Again, consent by any other name.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 months ago

            This discussion is going nowhere without a definition to shape it.

            https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/consent

            To express willingness, to give permission.

            It is impossible to give permission or express willingness without knowledge.

            I reject your use of consent in your examples… it would be better expressed as situational realities or obligations of existence rather then mindful permission.

            • bluewing@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              3 months ago

              Reject all you want. It does nothing to change the outcome.

              • Nelots@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                3 months ago

                You’re ignoring what they’re saying. They know that. They simply disagree with your definition of consent because, well, its not the definition of consent.

              • BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                3 months ago

                Consent comes before the outcome. If the outcome happens without consent, the outcome happens without consent. The word consent has a meaning and it isn’t “something that happened”