• mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yes, except that leaves us with one option for sending people into space again.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      Would splitting it into three separate companies make any difference? Like maybe at least one of the three would get its act together?

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        14 days ago

        No not at all. It is not a macro problem of organization. It’s a micro problem of rich executive fuckwits running the corpo instead of actual engineers.

        You can dice it up how ever you want, but if vapid, money-grubbing piles of trash are at the top, it will ALWAYS fail.

  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    NASA has only given Boeing the “Authority To Proceed” for three of its six potential operational Starliner missions. This milestone, known as ATP, is a decision point in contracting lingo where the customer—in this case, NASA—places a firm order for a deliverable. NASA has previously said it awards these task orders about two to three years prior to a mission’s launch.

    Josh Finch, a NASA spokesperson, told Ars that the agency hasn’t made any decisions on whether to commit to any more operational Starliner missions from Boeing beyond the three already on the books.

    So if Crew-4 through Crew-6 don’t fly, then three Atlas Vs could be up for sale. Perhaps Boeing could use one for CFT-2, should NASA require it :)

  • ptfrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    first operational mission for August 2025. But the agency set that schedule before realizing Boeing and Aerojet Rocketdyne would need to redesign seals and perhaps other elements

    Not sure this is correct. I had thought the slip from Feb 2025 to Aug 2025 was only announced quite recently. Say, a month ago?

    (Not that I’m saying I think the Aug 2025 date will be achieved. I’m 75% sure it won’t.)