Substance_P@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 months agoCome and take itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square245fedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down128
arrow-up11.11Karrow-down1imageCome and take itlemmy.worldSubstance_P@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square245fedilink
minus-squareShiggles@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down2·3 months agoHonestly at this point, if somebody’s best criticism is something is “unconstitutional”, it’s tough to not question why their best defense is a 250 year old piece of paper that was never meant to be dogmatic.
minus-squarerc__buggy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-23 months agoOh come on. Everyone gets a vote now. If you suppress someone’s vote, it’s unconstitutional. 14th, 1868 edit: or shit: 26th, 1971
minus-squareCileTheSanelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 months ago 14th, 1868 14th what? Oh, you mean the 14th Amendment, as in the document can be updated and changed.
Honestly at this point, if somebody’s best criticism is something is “unconstitutional”, it’s tough to not question why their best defense is a 250 year old piece of paper that was never meant to be dogmatic.
Oh come on. Everyone gets a vote now. If you suppress someone’s vote, it’s unconstitutional.
14th, 1868
edit: or shit: 26th, 1971
14th what?
Oh, you mean the 14th Amendment, as in the document can be updated and changed.