• ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Do the fires occur under the same circumstances?

    For example, if 1.3/10,000 EVs catch fire spontaneously while the 1.9/10,000 ICE cars only caught fire after serious accidents, I could see why folks might make that decision.

    • cron@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t know. But as an EV enthusiast, I hope that there will be more research on this topic. I feel that the perceived risk of burnibg is holding EVs back.

      It’s not a problem exclusive to Korea. In the United States, EVs have a 0.03 percent rate of catching fire, while internal combustion engine cars have a 1.5 percent rate, according to the latest report by the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board.

      And then there is the problem with existing data. How can the US numbers be so different than the Korean numbers?

      What about different battery technologies? Different cell chemistries? Is this one chinese manufacurer really at fault or is this just a wrong interpretation?

      So many questions, I can only hope we know more soon.

      • ccunning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Just to normalize numbers, if my math is right in the US that’s:

        • EVs 3/10,000
        • ICE 150/10,000 (😱)

        I’m really uninformed so this is just coming from a Joe-consumer perspective but I would guess EVs catching fire at double the rate in the US vs Korea must be manufacturer related, right? I’d guess the US is mostly Tesla and Korea is mostly BYD?

        • cron@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Car and/or battery manufacturer would be my guess, too.

          Korea probably has many Hyundai/Kia cars … but thats just guessing.