“No you see, idiot, uneducated worker, the economy is doing great actually. Now go back to the your 3rd job’s shift to barely make ends meet.”

  • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Stick around in these threads long enough and someone will come and post statistical proof that how you feel is anecdotal and of absolutely no bearing on realty. So at what point do you stop caring about the “definition” of recession and realize that maybe it’s not measured in a way that promotes a health society rather than just a healthy economy?

    Record profits and millions uninsured. Record profits and crumbling infrastructure. Record profits and mass layoffs. Maybe it’s fucked?

    • Roopappy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Or just use a different word that means what you’re trying to say. When you remove the meaning from words, it becomes harder to solve problems.

        • Roopappy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          That seems a lot more meaningful. GDP is going up, and most people are still feeling the crunch? That is a correctly identified issue that needs a solution.

          If you do stuff that historically fixes a real recession, you’re going to potentially make that problem worse.

      • sudo42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nah. Whatever word we use, some propagandist will argue its semantics rather than argue that people’s lives should actually be good enough to eat, be happy, be healthy, have a home and raise kids.

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Who is removing the meaning? If anything i thought we were trying to define it better and maybe challenge the traditional meaning because i don’t think it suits the current times. You are free to use a different word.

        • Roopappy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          So your argument here… is that you’re not trying to remove the meaning from a word.

          You’re just trying to change the traditional meaning and ask people who use the word correctly to use a new and different word.

          You’ve given me a lot to think about, thank you.

          • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Or maybe that correctly might be too traditional? If that’s too much i can just stop. I don’t wanna overload ya.

            • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Actually rereading my content: What i meant was to say “well just a different word” in regards to the current situation if recession doesn’t fit into the metrics of what a recession is. If you don’t like recession being used than give people who feel like it’s a recession a different word.