• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nerfing flame weapons then releasing a war bond with only flame weapons has to be the worst marketing move ever.

    Even if the nerfing is totally fine, the messaging is awful, hey we just made this stuff worse come buy it from us now.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not marketing that they fail, it’s communication. They should tell ahead of time which weapons are on their watch list, so it doesn’t seem like it falls from nowhere.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m convinced the conversation went something like this:

      “Hey we made these primary and secondary weapons that are mini flamethrowers, they don’t shoot as far but they’re still pretty cool, right?!”

      “Cool, so you can kill a Charger with your pistol now?”

      “Oh shit… Guess we’ll just nerf all fire damage then and say we’re doing it for ‘realisim’.”

      “Sounds good, Chief.”

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, i think thats exactly what happened.

        Let us kill chargers for gods sake, its not like they don’t put 12 of them out at the same time now… they are not exactly rare