Not true. It implicitly affirms the existence of Venezuela, despite the fact that all countries are social constructs and only exist because we believe in them. Believing in Venezuela is a choice and the article implicitly makes that choice based on no factual evidence. There can never be factual evidence for the existence of a country because they’re all fake.
I’m biased, but I’m not a hypocrite. I don’t claim to be unbiased. Biases are good sometimes. But lying about biases is almost always bad, and that’s what this bot is doing.
Not true. It implicitly affirms the existence of Venezuela, despite the fact that all countries are social constructs and only exist because we believe in them. Believing in Venezuela is a choice and the article implicitly makes that choice based on no factual evidence. There can never be factual evidence for the existence of a country because they’re all fake.
And yet here you are just accepting the existence of this ‘article’ based solely on some electric signals. Pot, meet Kettle.
I’m biased, but I’m not a hypocrite. I don’t claim to be unbiased. Biases are good sometimes. But lying about biases is almost always bad, and that’s what this bot is doing.