• Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    That seems like pretty technical and advanced forgery for someone of his inclination?

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          You can see people doing that all the time. The biggest barrier is if your ethics allow you to do it. A lot of people have gotten very wealthy because their ethics don’t care.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 months ago

      A technical and advanced forgery would have corrected the checksums. Any script kiddie that knows a bit of python can forge packets with the scapy library, or any number of other packet manipulation libraries.

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        What would some use cases be for forging packets, aside from trying to claim a stolen election.

        I’m not really asking because I want to do anything nefarious; just pure curiosity with these kind of things. Darknet Diaries is a great podcast for this kind of thing.

        • cheet@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          Funny packets make things behave funny sometimes. Sometimes you just need to see how something behaves when you send it illegal packets that the real software would never send.

          It also makes it possible to cheat in some games by lying to the game server about interactions in game.

          Essentially hackers need a way to talk to machines at every level of every protocol and Scapy is a pretty standard way of achieving that.

    • mholiv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think someone sold it to him knowing he was too incompetent to have a second source check it.