🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 3 months agoAnon drinks milksh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square151fedilinkarrow-up1766arrow-down127
arrow-up1739arrow-down1imageAnon drinks milksh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 3 months agomessage-square151fedilink
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agobelieve whatever you like, but if you use your own definition, be aware others will not understand your meaning, and it is not a failing on their part
minus-squareMindTravellerlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoYes it is. It’s a limit on their empathy. They chose to define personhood the weird exclusionary way because they’re weird exclusionists.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agodo you lack the empathy to imagine any other reason they may exclude non-humans from personhood? you don’t think there may be practical reasons?
minus-squareMindTravellerlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoYes that’s right, I don’t see any other good reason
believe whatever you like, but if you use your own definition, be aware others will not understand your meaning, and it is not a failing on their part
Yes it is. It’s a limit on their empathy. They chose to define personhood the weird exclusionary way because they’re weird exclusionists.
do you lack the empathy to imagine any other reason they may exclude non-humans from personhood? you don’t think there may be practical reasons?
Yes that’s right, I don’t see any other good reason