• bsergay@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Thank you for the elaborate answer! I appreciate it 😊. It’s also been instrumental to put your earlier statements into perspective. Incoming long comment…

    Blaming users for a lack of proper UX is always the best excuse.

    With all due respect, blaming UX doesn’t help your case 😅.

    Bazzite, a SteamOS clone based on Fedora plus some extra sauce, comes very close to the best UX out there (on desktop Linux). If you choose to blame that instead of (primarily) looking at yourself, then I simply don’t know what to say.

    Yet the only information I could find by other users of the distro.

    Where? I want to see it. A quick search didn’t yield anything like that.

    The issue you’ve faced is peculiar for a multitude of reasons:

    • It implies you’re unaware that Firefox was installed as a flatpak and all of the implications that come with being a flatpak.
    • It implies that you lack the most basic knowledge on Flatpak, the primary package manager for GUI apps on Bazzite. That’s like not knowing apt/dnf/pacman on Arch/Debian/Fedora.
    • It (possibly) implies you were seemingly unaware that about:support contains information on where you may find the profile directory.
    • It (possibly) implies you were incapable of reading the correct location from about:support.
    • It (possibly) implies you failed to find the location read from about:support.
    • It implies you don’t know how immutability works on Bazzite. You don’t even know which directories are and aren’t read-only.

    The three points that start with ‘(possibly)’ are especially curious, as they shouldn’t have happened in the first place IF you had read the simple instructions on Firefox Profilemaker; which you reference elsewhere. You can blame documentation all you want. But, honestly, I’m not confident you would even make proper use of it based on this awful track record.

    I even checked the official documentation, which contained 0 information on Firefox profiles.

    Why would it have to mention information on Firefox profiles? This is literally not even an issue. Even referring to it as a ‘you problem’ would be nice. Same applies to referring to this as ‘skill issue’. Which you actually took as offensive (or something), but it was actually just me being nice.

    Documentation efforts should be spent on stuff that are otherwise literally undocumented. Firefox profiles works identical across the board. But you somehow failed at it and chose to blame immutability smh and called it quits based on (seemingly) a single user report that I’ve yet to see/find.

    The FF profile manager only led to temporary folders and the absolute path led to an inexistent / invalid one (the one you’d expect them to go normally).

    I simply fail to reproduce this. I’ve got no clue what you were doing. Consider making a video.

    So yes, I guess my skills are low

    I appreciate your honesty.

    but so is the possibility for me to even learn anything when the only barely scrapped info I could find is wrong.

    Like, I assume you went to the Firefox profile manager website, downloaded whatever config you ended up with and followed its instructions related to implementing it. When I do this, I just go over the folder as found on about:support, paste it there and done. Like, with all due respect, how did you fail at this? Sorry, I simply fail to understand. Again, consider recording this.

    Furthermore, I implore you to link me to the misinformation you’ve found; I tried finding it on my own, but I simply failed.

    No, that and the rpm fusion install page is quite literally exactly what I used.

    Thank you for correcting my incorrect assumption. Though, I wonder; did you update your complete system before you applied the steps as found on RPM Fusion’s documentation? Knowing that you’ve been a user of Manjaro for two years, it only makes sense to assume you did. And, if that’s the case, then that’s an unfortunate bug and/or breakage that you’re not guilty of. Consider reporting it.

    Then no applications would launch, no UI functions would work and after I hard reset the PC it wouldn’t show me anything but a broken welcome page, which, when closed, left me with a blank black screen and my mouse cursor.

    All of this is unexpected behavior. Again, if you did nothing wrong, then this seems to be simply on Fedora. They aren’t saints, so they can definitely miss the mark. Though, I can’t recall anyone else experiencing this due to legit reasons. However, I am aware there’s a first to everything.

    I’m not sure what else you would expect me to do when following seemingly official command guidelines. But I guess it’s still my fault after all.

    Again, if you updated your system after installation, then did a reboot (perhaps more than one). And finally followed the steps as per RPM Fusion’s documentation. Then I simply fail to see what you would have done wrong.


    Regarding the distros you’ve tried and your experiences with them, I would like to note the following:

    • Thanks for mentioning Manjaro! I’ve actually been an avid opponent to its usage. However, so far, I wasn’t aware of anyone that had great experiences on it while they had tried a lot of interesting alternatives. Your experience actually successfully portrays a use case in which it seems to offer a superior experience. I suppose your only ‘sin’ would be to seek another distro while it was doing a pretty good job. Though, I’d have to commend you on your curiosity.
    • Your experience with EndeavourOS’ community is pretty different from how I recall it. They seemed to be very friendly overall. However, I can’t simply dismiss your experience. And while the shittiness of a distro’s community is not the best reason IMO to forego its use, I do respect your choice.
    • Your experience with openSUSE seems like some strange bug. Again, I can’t simply dismiss it, but it’s definitely unfortunate.
    • With Nobara, yet another pretty freaky breakage. Truth be told; I actually think that breakages as such are unfortunately inevitable. Most distros (especially those that run on the traditional Linux model) are on some timer that will inevitably amount to that.
    • Your issue on Bazzite was NOT breakage. Hence, if anything, it deserves a return more than the others do. Furthermore, by now, it should have been clear as day that your issue is actually not even an issue to begin with.
    • Breaking yet another distro, this time Fedora, is definitely an accomplishment. At this point, while the possibility definitely exists that there’s 0% blame on you; which is actually further supported by the fact that Manjaro lasted pretty long, it’s still very very peculiar.

    Don’t get me wrong. I’ve crapped my pants with Arch, EndeavourOS and Nobara. So, I very much understand that (semi-)rolling distros are far from perfect and can definitely break at seemingly random times. But, I choose to blame myself:

    • I was not very experienced.
    • I didn’t know best practices related to system management.
    • I had no clue what I was doing whenever I was troubleshooting issues.
    • I was a newb that didn’t spend enough time reading up on documentation.

    And, if you choose to equate/define or refer to all of the above as “lack of proper UX”, then I got a surprise for you… There are distros to which the above does not apply. So…, why do you choose to stick to distros that are known to be less trouble-free?

    Based on the above, a very curious observation would be that you somehow seem to attract problems that are otherwise observed a lot more rarely. At that point, I’m inclined to think that either you or the hardware is the main culprit. I wouldn’t blame the software that seems to be working for everyone else. But, that’s just me.

    Another curious observation would be that you (seemingly) have not tried anything based on Debian (and/or Ubuntu). Are you perhaps biased towards it? Or, are you simply aware that your hardware is too new for it (which I doubt unless you’ve continually changed to newer hardware in the past two years)? Or, you simply consciously choose to use ‘more current’ distros for whatever (perhaps legit) reason. Please feel free to inform us on this.

    Especially since absolutely no one is willing to help and rather throws insults and personal attacks around when facing people who struggle with all the major bugs.

    So, in my experience, the community has been lovely at large. Sure, it ain’t perfect, but what even is. Therefore, I’m sorry to hear that your experience has been different. Though, again, it might be the community reacting to someone they perceive as misinformed OR not diligent on making it work OR not being helpful towards those offering help.

    Furthermore, I’ve actually not found any post of yours in hopes of resolving any of these issues. Perhaps you chose to ask individual users in comments instead, but your track record on Lemmy doesn’t portray you as someone that’s diligent on solving the problem. For example, regarding Bazzite, if you had just joined their Discord and asked your question there, then they would have solved the issue for you that very moment and you wouldn’t have made a joke out of yourself.

    Though, I understand you might have lost interest to engage with communities like that based on some past experiences (e.g. with EndeavourOS’ community as you had already pointed out). FWIW, a single bad experience shouldn’t have deterred you from ever (re)commencing and/or (re-)engaging.


    Regardless, again, thanks for your elaborate answer. At this point, it genuinely makes most sense to me if you choose to give Bazzite another go if you’re willing to stick to distros with (at least relatively) up to date packages. If not, then consider trying something based on Debian (and/or Ubuntu) for once. Perhaps it’s the one thing you actually needed. Or, simply return back to Manjaro if it most successfully managed to satisfy your needs without putting you into too much trouble.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bazzite, a SteamOS clone based on Fedora plus some extra sauce, comes very close to the best UX out there (on desktop Linux). If you choose to blame that instead of (primarily) looking at yourself, then I simply don’t know what to say.

      If installing shit is 50 times more inconvenient & more or a hassle compared to pretty much any other distro I have ever used, then that’s clearly not the case.

      Where? I want to see it. A quick search didn’t yield anything like that.

      Some Reddit comment. Dunno which submission as I can’t seem to install even Mullvad on it, so I can’t hop DNS servers so I can’t circumvent Reddit’s VPN block to even bother looking for it again. But it’s definitely not a UX issue!

      It implies you're unaware that Firefox was installed as a flatpak and all of the implications that come with being a flatpak.
      It implies that you lack the most basic knowledge on Flatpak, the primary package manager for GUI apps on Bazzite. That's like not knowing apt/dnf/pacman on Arch/Debian/Fedora.
      It (possibly) implies you were seemingly unaware that about:support contains information on where you may find the profile directory.
      It (possibly) implies you were incapable of reading the correct location from about:support.
      It (possibly) implies you failed to find the location read from about:support.
      It implies you don't know how immutability works on Bazzite. You don't even know which directories are and aren't read-only.
      
      • Okay, and?
      • Again: And? There’s 0 documentation provided on where to find what I was looking for, so how would I know anything?
      • Neither about:support nor about:profiles show the correct profile folders. They show they path to where the profile folders would be NORMALLY (.mozilla/firefox/), but that is not the correct one as it contains just two empty folders and ignores any profile folders put into it. The actual folder, which again, is listed nowhere, including your suggested about page, is: “.var/app/org.mozilla.firefox/.mozilla/firefox/” Since you didn’t know that I guess that implies that you have a major skill issue?
      • Afaik everything within the root tree is read only, leaving you with only your home partition. That’s how people explained it. If you want to blame me for spreading that knowledge, go ahead. But it is people like you who clearly spread disinformation, as I have just proven.

      I’m not gonna read the rest of your text wall since your entitlement & insults just show the clownery that is your person after you clearly failed to even acknowledge the correct profile folder while trying to berate me. So, take up your own advise and work on your SKILL ISSUES.

      • bsergay@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        lol, the full answer I had written somehow was ripped to pieces. I’ll therefore keep it brief.

        • Thank you for the reply!
        • Apologies for making you wait so long for an answer! Thank you for your patience!
        • Thank you for correcting me when I had wrongfully suggested that it’s found in about:support while it’s found (as seen below) in about:profiles instead. I know it’s found in Firefox, I (just) messed up the exact spot. Therefore, thank you for countering misinformation!

        • You’ve mentioned stuff that require to be addressed and corrected, but I’ll leave it at this. You should read documentation and don’t take people’s words anyways.
        • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Thank you for correcting me when I had wrongfully suggested that it’s found in about:support while it’s found (as seen below) in about:profiles instead. I know it’s found in Firefox, I (just) messed up the exact spot. Therefore, thank you for countering misinformation!

          It was not found in either page, as I already explained. Maybe they’ve fixed it by now but at the time of my comment the page led to the mentioned empty standard folder path you’d expect on a regular installation.

          • bsergay@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Maybe they’ve fixed it by now but at the time of my comment the page led to the mentioned empty standard folder path you’d expect on a regular installation.

            Alright, so through the flathub remote-info --log flathub org.mozilla.firefox command, we can view which commit was active at that moment.

            Command yields:

            Firefox - Fast, Private & Safe Web Browser
            
            ID: org.mozilla.firefox
            Ref: app/org.mozilla.firefox/x86_64/stable
            Arch: x86_64
            Branch: stable
            Version: 129.0
            License: MPL-2.0
            Collection: org.flathub.Stable
            Download: 98.6 MB
            Installed: 259.6 MB
            Runtime: org.freedesktop.Platform/x86_64/23.08
            Sdk: org.freedesktop.Sdk/x86_64/23.08
            
            Commit: 57fc35d29f0ee4915ebd903e2b9ce5497972c175cf0a6950153ec91d6f1b3e33
            Parent: 6a16f6a509340ad3bb833c9d9aa794ed78910aa43803a7420438b880aa0a6ce0
            Subject: Export org.mozilla.firefox
            Date: 2024-08-06 12:45:05 +0000
            History: 
            
            Commit: 6a16f6a509340ad3bb833c9d9aa794ed78910aa43803a7420438b880aa0a6ce0
            Subject: Export org.mozilla.firefox
            Date: 2024-07-26 13:29:41 +0000
            
            Commit: 5b92a5aa533a8f68fe1d73f3910392018c4d4bb9f4370ee0577384e101999ce8
            Subject: Export org.mozilla.firefox
            Date: 2024-07-23 14:34:25 +0000
            

            So, at the time of your comment, commit 6a16f6a509340ad3bb833c9d9aa794ed78910aa43803a7420438b880aa0a6ce0 was active and deployed on your system. Let’s find out what downgrading to this commit yields.

            Downgrading through sudo flatpak update --commit=6a16f6a509340ad3bb833c9d9aa794ed78910aa43803a7420438b880aa0a6ce0 org.mozilla.firefox, after which the about:profiles page is opened on this downgraded Firefox yields:

            The beautiful part is that, as Flatpak is containerized anyways, anyone can downgrade to the earlier commit and it yields the exact same result. So, please feel free to verify this for yourself.

            So, as a result, if the logic and the appliance is sound, then this showcases that your claim is either still true and portrays an anomaly -which I would deem as highly unlikely- or it’s simply false and you were just mistaken.

            Finally, if I’ve messed up at any of the steps, then please feel free to correct me.

            • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              My guy, I don’t need to verify anything. I know what I saw. I literally clicked the open directory button too which just would lead me to the standard profile directory too. There’s 100% no mistaking it, as I have done this process countless of times over the past couple decades. Maybe it is the same weird way that the audio applet in the sys tray did not work at first and didn’t show any devices or apps, and how the audio system settings didn’t default properly for some games to the correct audio device - until they did some days later. If they had something like virtualbox in the repos I would’ve maybe installed the image I have on my usb stick again in a VM, but I’m not gonna through the process of wiping my installation again just to prove a point to some random rude asshole.