• solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    4 months ago

    i feel like “reform” isn’t strong enough of a word for what needs to be done with the supreme court. “fucking overhaul” sounds closer

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 months ago

      It needs “reform” as in it needs to be completely dismantled and re-formed with all new justices.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        with term limits. i don’t know if i’ll ever forgive RBG, no matter how much respect i had

        • Revan343
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          If not term limits, a mandatory retirement age

          • treefrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            Mandatory retirement age for all public officials would be nice. Tag it to mean life expectancy, -10 years.

            It would incentivize politicians to take care of the population in the long term.

            • Revan343
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              I do especially like the idea of basing it on average life expectancy; if they want to hold on to power, they’ll have to try and make people live longer. Biggest bang for their buck will be universal healthcare

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Funny, because to me the meaning of reform can be as serious as using the guillotine.
      Reform is when minor adjustments and changes are not enough. Reform is a complete overhaul.