• undercrust
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Holy shit the end of that story makes it so much better hahahahah

      • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nowhere in the book does that anecdote appear — and certainly not on the pages mentioned.

        The “journalist” wrote the article without reading the book.

        • elbucho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          I mean, would you? First of all, it’s far simpler to just do a ctrl-f on various keywords, like “couch”, “sofa”, or wink wink “LOVEseat”. Secondly, they don’t make nearly enough money to willingly poison their minds reading that absolute garbage.

          • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s what I found funny about it. It’s something that could have been resolved in an instant of people said either “Yes, it’s on page whatever whatever,” or “We just read it, and no, it’s not there.” It took longer to resolve because of how few people have read it recently, or were willing to read it now.