• undercrust
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Holy shit the end of that story makes it so much better hahahahah

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nowhere in the book does that anecdote appear — and certainly not on the pages mentioned.

      The “journalist” wrote the article without reading the book.

      • elbucho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean, would you? First of all, it’s far simpler to just do a ctrl-f on various keywords, like “couch”, “sofa”, or wink wink “LOVEseat”. Secondly, they don’t make nearly enough money to willingly poison their minds reading that absolute garbage.

        • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s what I found funny about it. It’s something that could have been resolved in an instant of people said either “Yes, it’s on page whatever whatever,” or “We just read it, and no, it’s not there.” It took longer to resolve because of how few people have read it recently, or were willing to read it now.