• Cadeillac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, no, that makes no sense, furthering my point that you can’t. The instruments are what is in sync. Not the music. Tone doesn’t matter. If the instruments remain in the same synchronization, then they are just still synchronized

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      synchronization

      noun

      the operation or activity of two or more things at the same time or rate.

      The instruments are “in sync” because of what is being played on them, not from the mere fact of being musical instruments. To get two instruments being played in sync, you’d need two (or one very skilled) musicist to play them. I couldn’t play in sync with anyone, I wouldn’t know how.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s not really a question of opinion though. There’s quite a clear definition…

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              You can say you don’t agree with the facts, but the facts are still the facts.

              The instruments can’t be “in sync” just by the virtue of being instruments. A violin sitting on a shelf won’t ever be in sync with anything. It needs to be played for it to be in sync. When it’s played, what constitutes “being in sync”? The same time or tempo, if you will.

              https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/in sync