More money in the pockets of entry-level workers sounds great, but Rachel Greszler of the conservative Heritage Foundation argues that such workers, and the economy writ large, are hurt more than helped by increases in the minimum wage.
The other user only provided FDR quotes, which is not in contention. You however have not provided any other material except a link you claim proves your point… but naturally it doesn’t which is probably why you didn’t quote anything in the article.
This is a step in the right direction for you, you’re not making up excuses as to why you can’t provide information. I can only assume you didn’t comprehend the article but at least you tried.
lol I comprehend my own sources just fine, you just don’t like the information.
The link provided is from the very department that defines and enforces minimum wage law. I’m pretty sure they know what the fuck it’s meant for, as well as the President who led its advancement through congress.
Once again, not liking something doesn’t mean the information is wrong.
lol I comprehend my own sources just fine, you just don’t like the information.
Strange that you can’t provide the quote that proves your point
The link provided is from the very department that defines and enforces minimum wage law. I’m pretty sure they know what the fuck it’s meant for, as well as the President who led its advancement through congress.
Your literacy issues strike again, I have not disputed the accuracy of the link just the information you claim is in there is not.
Once again you have not produced a quote of the information you claim proves your point. Here is a link to my source that totally proves everything I said. https://www.wikipedia.org/
Hahahaha you can’t even be bothered to send an actual relevant link, or recite your actual problems with the sources because there is no problem, you just don’t like them.
You’re so bad at this you’re single-handedly proving why we need a better education system in this country, because you’re so confidently incorrect it’s obvious you don’t even know how to have a good faith discussion with someone.
You can’t just throw away a source because you don’t like the information and won’t read it. That just makes you stubborn and ill-informed. 🤣
I’m not your mom. You want a bedtime story? Go read it yourself.
Hahahaha you can’t even be bothered to send an actual relevant link, or recite your actual problems with the sources because there is no problem, you just don’t like them
I see my point of linking to Wikipedia.org went right over your head, I should have expected that.
You can’t just throw away a source because you don’t like the information and won’t read it. That just makes you stubborn and ill-informed. 🤣
I did read it and there’s nothing showing FDR supporting a $0.40 rate and it being opposed for the $0.40 rate, there were a whole host of other reasons but not the rate.
I’m not your mom. You want a bedtime story? Go read it yourself.
I see you’re back to claiming you have evidence but refuse to provide it because … reasons. It’s so strange that this constantly happens to you, it’s almost like you’re full of shit and can’t back it up.
Oh Jesus. Now you’re using your own second goalpost move as gospel so your original statement that the minimum wage was not intended to be a living wage won’t be wrong.
Your messages are 99% projection, Jimbo. I’m starting to think you legitimately aren’t aware.
Mkay Mr. “Every source that proves me wrong is wrong”
The only source you’ve provided is an FDR quote. I have provided evidence of what FDR did. There’s an old saying actions speak louder than words.
I provided more than that and another user chimed in, did you conveniently forget that already?
Hahaha poor Jimbo, can’t even remember what he’s mad about.
The other user only provided FDR quotes, which is not in contention. You however have not provided any other material except a link you claim proves your point… but naturally it doesn’t which is probably why you didn’t quote anything in the article.
This is a step in the right direction for you, you’re not making up excuses as to why you can’t provide information. I can only assume you didn’t comprehend the article but at least you tried.
lol I comprehend my own sources just fine, you just don’t like the information.
The link provided is from the very department that defines and enforces minimum wage law. I’m pretty sure they know what the fuck it’s meant for, as well as the President who led its advancement through congress.
Once again, not liking something doesn’t mean the information is wrong.
Strange that you can’t provide the quote that proves your point
Your literacy issues strike again, I have not disputed the accuracy of the link just the information you claim is in there is not.
Once again you have not produced a quote of the information you claim proves your point. Here is a link to my source that totally proves everything I said. https://www.wikipedia.org/
Hahahaha you can’t even be bothered to send an actual relevant link, or recite your actual problems with the sources because there is no problem, you just don’t like them.
You’re so bad at this you’re single-handedly proving why we need a better education system in this country, because you’re so confidently incorrect it’s obvious you don’t even know how to have a good faith discussion with someone.
You can’t just throw away a source because you don’t like the information and won’t read it. That just makes you stubborn and ill-informed. 🤣
I’m not your mom. You want a bedtime story? Go read it yourself.
I see my point of linking to Wikipedia.org went right over your head, I should have expected that.
I did read it and there’s nothing showing FDR supporting a $0.40 rate and it being opposed for the $0.40 rate, there were a whole host of other reasons but not the rate.
I see you’re back to claiming you have evidence but refuse to provide it because … reasons. It’s so strange that this constantly happens to you, it’s almost like you’re full of shit and can’t back it up.
Oh Jesus. Now you’re using your own second goalpost move as gospel so your original statement that the minimum wage was not intended to be a living wage won’t be wrong.
Your messages are 99% projection, Jimbo. I’m starting to think you legitimately aren’t aware.