• holgersson@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Come on, I’ll bite and feed the troll.

    Why do you think that Baldurs Gate 3 is objectively a fundamentally bad game?

    • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      I can’t throw money at it to compensate the lack of my skills. This is why EA games are so good. /s

      A game needs guns that do pow pow for it to be good. Call of duty is a really good game, because guns are cool. /s

      This game forces me to read, which is something I can’t. /s

      This game forces me to think, which is something I can’t. /s

      All games have insane amount of bugs and lack gameplay. This is the gaming standard. BG3 is different, so I don’t like it. /s

      The devs actually put in a lot of effort to produce a proper game worth it’s price. So, do these devs think they’re better then the rest of us or something? Lame. /s

      Clearly the troll is an EA dev.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      (not op) The strongest argument I could make is that DND 5e is not a good system and holds the game back, but even that doesn’t really make it “fundamentally a bad game”.

    • therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Its some annoying narrator telling you what’s happening instead of showing you what’s happening. Like it’ll say “you are in anguish” and your character just stands there staring at a wall. DnD this way doesn’t translate well to a game.