• poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not if (as the article rightly points out) it helps upholding and justifying current elite power with the illusion of merit. It is exactly this naive thinking that the “best” system automatically wins, when in reality our world works nothing like that.

    • Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      So what would you propose as an alternative? Should we go back to nepotism? I feel like a flawed implementation of meritocracy is better than openly accepting nepotism again.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        What makes you think our current system isn’t mostly based on nepotism? What exactly do you want to go “back” to?

        And even if you are lucky to be based in a slightly more meritocratic society, you argument is similar to someone saying “Should we go back to monarchism? I feel like a flawed implementation of capitalism is better than openly accepting monarchy again.” Which is a false dichotomy.

        And no, I am not going to spoon-feed you viable alternatives, because apparently you are still stuck in the TINA mindset, which you first need to discard.