Beaver to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoBiden's performance has been exceptional where it matters: It's the economywww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up1414arrow-down169
arrow-up1345arrow-down1external-linkBiden's performance has been exceptional where it matters: It's the economywww.salon.comBeaver to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square126fedilink
minus-squareKevonLooney@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down1·5 months ago You’re agreeing with me. You even agree with that in the first sentence, what do you think you’re arguing about? So why do you think I’m arguing with you?
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down18·5 months agoI don’t. You’re agreeing with me that biden is a good president, but incorrect that he’s only a good precedent relative to Trump. You’re very confused. Do you have any questions?
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·5 months ago…but you said they’re arguing with you, which is why they asked why you think they’re arguing with you.
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down7·edit-25 months agoWhat I said is: “what do you think you’re arguing about?” I didn’t mention myself. It’s clear they meant to be arguing something, but if their argument was directed against me, they probably wouldn’t have agreed with me. If they were arguing against Biden, they probably wouldn’t have praised him. So, what do they think they’re arguing against?
minus-squareKevonLooney@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·5 months ago It’s clear they meant to be arguing something Right… if their argument was directed against me, they probably wouldn’t have agreed with me. Keep going… If they were arguing against Biden, they probably wouldn’t have praised him. Almost there…
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·5 months agoYou’re stuck? I’m not going to spoil it for you, maybe you’ll eventually work it out.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoIt’s OK to admit you were wrong, man. It won’t actually be physically painful.
minus-squareVaryk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·5 months agoI’m very comfortable admitting when I’m wrong. I’m very comfortable here being right.
So why do you think I’m arguing with you?
I don’t.
You’re agreeing with me that biden is a good president, but incorrect that he’s only a good precedent relative to Trump.
You’re very confused. Do you have any questions?
…but you said they’re arguing with you, which is why they asked why you think they’re arguing with you.
What I said is:
“what do you think you’re arguing about?”
I didn’t mention myself.
It’s clear they meant to be arguing something, but if their argument was directed against me, they probably wouldn’t have agreed with me.
If they were arguing against Biden, they probably wouldn’t have praised him.
So, what do they think they’re arguing against?
Right…
Keep going…
Almost there…
You’re stuck?
I’m not going to spoil it for you, maybe you’ll eventually work it out.
It’s OK to admit you were wrong, man. It won’t actually be physically painful.
I’m very comfortable admitting when I’m wrong.
I’m very comfortable here being right.
And youre wrong again.