• friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    FAA controls airspace from the blades of grass up. Airplanes are legally allowed to fly over private property, and drones are legally allowed to fly over private property. This is the current legal standing in America. I’m not saying it’s right, but that’s what it is.

    • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think thats right, otherwise you could sit in a drone and harass people on their property as long as you don’t land there… That doesn’t sound right. And i know its not legal in Germany, i hope its not actually like that in USA

      • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Harassing people violates local law, and reports of harassment and such are the only way local law enforcement can respond to drone issues since local law enforcement does not have the jurisdiction to enforce the federal statutes where the FAA regulates drones.

        Drone law is crazy. There are lots of unintuitive things about it. It needs an overhaul.

        • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ok but what classifies as harassment? For me it would be seeing, hearing or feeling intrusive behavior by airborne objects in the airspace directly above my property.

          • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            What you describe is common. If you see a drone, you call your police and tell them you feel threatened or harassed. They will deal with it.

            FYI all drones are required to broadcast a remote id that is registered to the drone device which is registered to a drone pilot. Your phone can receive that remote id signal, which you can give to law enforcement so they can find the pilot. Not having remote id on a drone is a felony, because once again, drones operate in federally controlled airspace.

            https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/remote_id

            • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              What you describe is common. If you see a drone, you call your police and tell them you feel threatened or harassed. They will deal with it.

              if thats how it works, thats ok.

              FYI all drones are required to broadcast a remote id that is registered to the drone device which is registered to a drone pilot. Your phone can receive that remote id signal, which you can give to law enforcement so they can find the pilot. Not having remote id on a drone is a felony, because once again, drones operate in federally controlled airspace.

              https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/remote_id

              Interesting

      • Voyajer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        It is correct, you can even land there if you must and you’re allowed to retrieve it. I’ve had to explain this to a farmer once while recovering a hot air balloon at gunpoint.

        • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          The emergency landing is one thing but just flying directly over private property (as in living areas and industrial complexes) is just crazy to me, agricultural areas are a different thing threre is nothing privat happening there and there are no possible industrial problems (security, safety…)

          • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            There is so little unoccupied or public land in places where people want to live. It would be impossible if that was the rule.

            • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I said agricultural areas are fine cause nothing is happening there, Forrest as well and yes thats basically how it is in Germany.

              • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Forests don’t need deliveries. And good luck flying planes anywhere over just forests.

                There’s a reason the FAA has the regulations it has.