• uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Did you try to read “СКРАМ”(SCRUM) backwards? It’s “МАРКС”(MARX).

          Translated version:

            • uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I don’t hate it. It’s just tech meme. Even article that polularised it says that text is incorrect. But it’s just funny.

  • Tramort@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    How do you make it safe and inviting while also protecting anonymity?

    Some anonymous users are prone to pretty awful behavior, and non anonymous users will be profiled.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      For interaction? Pseudonyms with a ramp up into being able to interact fully is the middle ground. Your activity on that specific site will be monitored to kick you out if you behave inappropriately, but it shouldn’t carry across sites unless you voluntarily use a third party identity provider (which is a good option to have).

      Massive scale is a big part of the issue. It raises the barrier to entry for competing platforms (because being able to scale to rapid growth is a huge up front investment, and can easily cripple your platform if you don’t do so), and brings the moderation responsibilities beyond anything actually manageable. Small to mid sized communities being the norm is much more manageable, much easier to develop for, and much healthier generally.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Federated systems are one option for this. On one of my sites, the only way people can leave comments is with ActivityPub. They must have a (probably pseudonymous) account on a server to use that, and I hope that most servers have moderation I find acceptable. I can block those that do not.

      More sophisticated options for sharing reputation between servers would help here. If, for example five servers I trust block another server as a source of harassment, I’d like to block it as well, automatically.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          It is still a thing, but nobody wants to use it, because the flaws of other systems they want to use for themselves.