• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m not debating whether taking down the statue was right or not. My point of contention is that when Trump said very fine people there is no indication he was calling nazis and white supremists very fine people.

    • Bongo_Stryker
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah I understand the argument here: Somehow, mixed in among those white supremacists and nazis were some very fine people who just happened to find common cause with racists and fascists, but remained morally and ethically seperate from the groups they were marching together in the streets with. I find this assertion unconvincing.

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Is your argument that having any view similar to a white supremists or Nazi that makes you a white supremists or Nazi?

        • Bongo_Stryker
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          No, I don’t make that claim because it is too general. It seems like a setup for a reductio ad adsurdum argument that I don’t feel like I want to cooperate with.

          I’m saying that if one finds themself marching in the same protest in the same street on the same side as david duke the notorious klansman, then one is not in my opinion a “very fine person”.

          • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Guilty by association is a common logical fallacy, it doesn’t matter how you try to narrow down.

            • Bongo_Stryker
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              We are not talking about association, we are talking about participation. There is a big difference.

              Anyway go ahead and explain to me how there were some perfectly normal non-racist people there protesting the removal of a pro-slavery war monument, and that’s who Donald “immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country” Trump was talking about.

              • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                We are not talking about association, we are talking about participation. There is a big difference.

                The majority of protesters on both sides remained peaceful, the presence of white supremists in a protest doesn’t change the act of a peaceful protests.

                Anyway go ahead and explain to me how there were some perfectly normal non-racist people there protesting the removal of a pro-slavery war monument

                It wasn’t a pro slavery monument. Lee’s reunification efforts after the war were his major contribution. He convinced other generals and colonels to put down their arms and not engage in guerrilla warfare, Grant agreed not to imprison confederate soldiers based on Lee efforts. I can list more of Lee’s reunification efforts if you’d like.

                that’s who Donald “immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country” Trump was talking about.

                I have no idea what you are talking about, I doubt you do either.