That site is garbage. The atomic unit of propaganda is not lies, it’s emphasis. NYT (and most western news media have supported every single military action the US has done when it mattered.
This isn’t reflected in their ratings, since they don’t need to use lies to get people believing wild misconceptions. It is reflected in the way the American people are mobilized to support each military action.
It’s a similar social construct as “tankie”. While “tankie” describes anyone left of Bernie Sanders, “dronnie” describes anyone that’s wittingly or unwittingly pro US imperialist.
This is an article from a CCP operated tabloid… Seriously?
I’m sure news outlets that operate for capital are much more trustworthy.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
That site is garbage. The atomic unit of propaganda is not lies, it’s emphasis. NYT (and most western news media have supported every single military action the US has done when it mattered.
This isn’t reflected in their ratings, since they don’t need to use lies to get people believing wild misconceptions. It is reflected in the way the American people are mobilized to support each military action.
Removed by mod
There you go dronnie:
https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/china-nuclear-fusion-reactor-artificial-sun-chengdu-b1767393.html
Next time Google it yourself
Edit: Actually that one’s from 2020. Youll have to wait until western sources “verify” (read: cope) about it in a week or two
Removed by mod
It’s a similar social construct as “tankie”. While “tankie” describes anyone left of Bernie Sanders, “dronnie” describes anyone that’s wittingly or unwittingly pro US imperialist.
Keep using it. I’m sure it’ll catch on…
Thank you for your encouragement, dronie…
Removed by mod
Pretty sure it should be “dronie,” not “dronnie,” by English phonetics.
Unless you’re pronouncing it like the name “Donnie” but with an ‘r’ in there.
You’re right it actually is “dronie”.
Cool. Just want to make sure we’re all hating one another correctly. 🙄