No amount of whitewashing is going to fix that. Almost half of them in-fact celebrate it.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sculptor Moses Ezekiel included the weeping figure of the loyal black mammy as a correction to what he and the UDC saw as lies about history perpetrated by the North.

    • psycotica0
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      5 months ago

      Honestly, it’s not as bad as I expected. It’s one of those ones with a big angel on top, and then a bunch of scenes around the base, and I’m assuming the problematic bits are just among the scenes somewhere.

      I’m not saying it should be restored, but it’s not like it’s a statue of only the bad stuff. I could see how someone who doesn’t really care could look at the picture from afar and go “what!? They took down a commemorative grave monument? Sacrilege!”

      I guess what I’m saying is that it’s not like they necessarily voted to put up a big statue of a slave, they voted to put up a statue with many figures, including a slave in it somewhere. Still probably best to leave it gone, though.

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        If I told you that there was a painting honoring fallen soldiers and they only hid a couple swastikas in it there would be no conversation to be had.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Your analogy is good but sadly you’re mistaken about “there would be no conversation to be had.” There’s a part of the Wrong Wing party that would fight for it.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        When I was reading the description, this is the part that made me certain it needed to go:

        This Latin phrase means: “The Victorious Cause was Pleasing to the Gods, But the Lost Cause Pleased Cato.” It is a quotation from the poem Pharsalia by the ancient Roman poet Lucan. It refers to the attempt by the Roman Senator Pompey to prevent Julius Caesar from becoming dictator of Rome in 49 BC. Although he lost, Pompey’s actions pleased the great philosopher and statesman Cato (who was noted for his moral integrity).

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          So basically, anti slavery pleased God but pro slavery pleased Cato which would be a reference to all people with moral integrity in this case.

          My interpretation is correct?

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            While the modern monotheistic God is thought of as inherently good and right, the Greek gods were frequently bad and immoral. I think the implication is that though fate or whatever powers that be made them lose, they were right and moral.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Oh that’s right, I hadn’t thought about the morals of the Greek gods being questionable, but it still implies that the creator saw slavery as being moral, which is pretty sick…

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Somewhere? Marching into fucking battle on behalf of the Confederacy.

        You’re arguing in favor of the equivalent of a mural that shows a Jew fighting on the Nazi front lines.