• MindTraveller
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    The alternative is having the choice made for you, and living in someone else’s mental constructs. And almost always, the person building your mental world is a rich capitalist who wants to control you and use you for profit and political gain.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      The alternative is to recognize what the real world is like and why things are the way they are.

      There are some mental constructs that we do operate in society - it is often ingrained that private property is inalienable, that money and not resources run the economy, that laws are the rules for the functioning of the world and not a set of reasons for triggering state-sanctioned violence, that the state itself is something more than a bunch of people building an incentivised system for everyone to behave in a certain way.

      Those are important to dismantle - but we still live in a world that actually follows a lot of natural laws, and it won’t change simply because you decide to ignore them.

      From gravity to laws of supply and demand, those are all very real, and you cannot ignore them - I mean, you can, but they won’t stop working.

      • MindTraveller
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Doesn’t matter how loud you conservatives say it, you won’t make it true. Reality isn’t real.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You are quick to label me a conservative. I’m a progressivist, communist, and scientist.

          And reality is real by definition.

          • MindTraveller
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The political spectrum is relative, there are no objective points on it. As a realist communist, you’re progressive compared to most people, but you’re conservative compared to a soulist.

            And the argument that reality is real by definition holds about as much water as the argument that the Christian god exists by definition. You see, theologically Deus is defined as the personification of the quality of existence in the universe. What property does your argument for reality have that a Christian argument for Deus doesn’t have?

            • Allero@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              It is the fact that the very word “reality” expresses the combination of what is real, the totality of everything that is actually existent.

              We may be wrong in our understanding of reality, but whatever the truth is, it is a reality.

              If God actually exists, it is a reality. If He doesn’t exist, it is a reality, too. The actual absolute truth about the world is a reality. If you want to go beyond that, you land in the category of fiction, which, by its very definition, describes what is made up and doesn’t exist.

              If you want fiction to be real, you face a clear issue with your semantics.

              • MindTraveller
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Oh, I see what the problem is. At the beginning of the thread, we were all using the colloquial definition of reality. You came into the thread using a highly formal definition of reality and thought we were all using that term. No, we weren’t. There’s no such thing as what, for clarity’s sake, we’ll call objective reality. It’s as nonexistent as Santa Claus.

                • Allero@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Objective reality is the only thing that’s real, and we explore parts of it, and sometimes are wrong.

                  Now, our perception of reality (what I suspect you mean by “colloquial definition”) might in fact be wrong, which is why we should base our worldview on the confirmed evidence that almost certainly reflects the way world is (and not say “screw it, everything is real to me now”).

                  • MindTraveller
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    should base our worldview on the confirmed evidence that almost certainly reflects the way world is

                    We don’t have any of that stuff. Nothing has ever been proven objectively real, and nothing probably ever will.