• corsicanguppy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      So is coal extraction. How long has that coal fire burned under that town? 60 years?

      • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        You can read all about the Centralia mine fire here. ISC for oil extraction, as referenced by the paper, is not applicable to coal mining.

            • optissima@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              5 months ago

              To spell it out for you, Just because something is well established in the industry does not make it good.

              • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                I never said it was good. I said it was a well established practice in response to @[email protected] who seemed surprised that anyone would even consider it. I was surprised to learn about it as well, but it makes sense to use the oil or gas in the deposit to directly help fuel the process.

                • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  MANY WELL ESTABLISHED practices are horribly stupid…

                  See the many natural disasters caused by company standard practices.

                  1. Dumped raw toxins directly into rivers

                  2. Locking the doors on clothing factories

                  3. Fracking

                  • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    None of those things are in situ combustion thermal recovery. It may well be that this method isn’t appropriate for the process described in the paper. The paper also suggests RF thermal recovery as an alternative. The process just requires additional heat besides the steam to affect the SMR reaction and get the hydrogen out.